Test output: teeks99-dkr-mg8 - function_types

Notes

This test case was explicitly marked up in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml file in the Boost repository as "expected to fail", but is passing. Please consult the notes/output below for more details.

[ Tobias Schwinger ] Not all compilers/platforms implement nonstandard calling conventions.

With GCC/x86 this failure reflects http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29328 .

Compile [2024-11-15 23:58:51 UTC]: succeed



    "g++-8"   -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=c++17 -fPIC -m64 -pthread -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -fvisibility=hidden  -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_COBALT_USE_STD_PMR=1   -I".." -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/assert/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/core/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/detail/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/function_types/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/throw_exception/include"  -c -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/function_types/test/member_ccs.test/gcc-8~c++17/debug/x86_64/debug-symbols-off/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/member_ccs.o" "../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/member_ccs.cpp"

../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/member_ccs.cpp:12:67: note: #pragma message: Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined
 BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE("Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined")
                                                                   ^