Test output: teeks99-dkr-mg6-g14 - function_types - nonmember_ccs_exact / gcc-6~gnu14
Rev e7912689e0ea63ee621658db160d310e13d30a46 / Tue, 05 Nov 2024 01:01:57 +0000
Notes
This test case was explicitly marked up in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml file in the Boost repository as "expected to fail", but is passing. Please consult the notes/output below for more details.
[ Tobias Schwinger ] Not all compilers/platforms implement nonstandard calling conventions.
Compile [2024-11-05 03:42:17 UTC]: succeed


    "g++-6"   -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=gnu++14 -fPIC -m64 -pthread -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -fvisibility=hidden  -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_COBALT_USE_STD_PMR=1   -I".." -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/assert/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/core/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/detail/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/function_types/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/throw_exception/include"  -c -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/function_types/test/nonmember_ccs_exact.test/gcc-6~gnu14/debug/x86_64/debug-symbols-off/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/nonmember_ccs_exact.o" "../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/nonmember_ccs_exact.cpp"

../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/nonmember_ccs_exact.cpp:12:67: note: #pragma message: Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined
 BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE("Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined")
                                                                   ^