Test output: teeks99-dkr-dc17-warn - function_types - member_ccs

Notes

This test case was explicitly marked up in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml file in the Boost repository as "expected to fail", but is passing. Please consult the notes/output below for more details.

[ Tobias Schwinger ] Not all compilers/platforms implement nonstandard calling conventions.

With GCC/x86 this failure reflects http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29328 .

Compile [2024-11-11 12:49:43 UTC]: succeed



    "clang++-17"   -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wno-c99-extensions -std=c++20 -Wall -Wextra -fPIC -pthread -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -fvisibility=hidden -m64 --target=x86_64-pc-linux  -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_COBALT_USE_STD_PMR=1   -I".." -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/assert/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/core/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/detail/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/function_types/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/throw_exception/include" -I"/var/boost/run/boost_root/libs/type_traits/include"  -c -o "/var/boost/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/function_types/test/member_ccs_exact.test/clang-linux-17~c++20~warn/debug/x86_64/debug-symbols-off/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/member_ccs_exact.o" "../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/member_ccs_exact.cpp"

../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/member_ccs_exact.cpp:12:1: warning: Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined [-W#pragma-messages]
BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE("Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined")
^
../boost/config/pragma_message.hpp:24:34: note: expanded from macro 'BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE'
# define BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE(x) _Pragma(BOOST_STRINGIZE(message(x)))
                                 ^
<scratch space>:3:2: note: expanded from here
 message("Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined")
 ^
1 warning generated.