Test output: teeks99-06-dg11-20-64onaarch64 - function_types

Notes

This test case was explicitly marked up in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml file in the Boost repository as "expected to fail", but is passing. Please consult the notes/output below for more details.

[ Tobias Schwinger ] Not all compilers/platforms implement nonstandard calling conventions.

Compile [2024-11-20 01:36:41 UTC]: succeed



    "g++-11"   -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -std=c++20 -fPIC -pthread -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -fvisibility=hidden  -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_COBALT_USE_STD_PMR=1   -I".." -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/assert/include" -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/core/include" -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/detail/include" -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/function_types/include" -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/throw_exception/include" -I"/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/boost_root/libs/type_traits/include"  -c -o "/mnt/fs1/teeks99-06/run/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/function_types/test/nonmember_ccs_exact.test/gcc-11~c++20/debug/arm_64/debug-symbols-off/threading-multi/visibility-hidden/nonmember_ccs_exact.o" "../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/nonmember_ccs_exact.cpp"

In file included from ../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/nonmember_ccs_exact.cpp:11:
../boost/config/pragma_message.hpp:24:34: note: ???#pragma message: Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined???
   24 | # define BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE(x) _Pragma(BOOST_STRINGIZE(message(x)))
      |                                  ^~~~~~~
../libs/function_types/test/custom_ccs/nonmember_ccs_exact.cpp:12:1: note: in expansion of macro ???BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE???
   12 | BOOST_PRAGMA_MESSAGE("Test skipped because _M_IX86 is not defined")
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~